Author: Hugo Rossi Figueirôa
This article intends to investigate the impact that public policies to combat “fake news” have on the democratic regime and the rule of law. With the exponential growth in the number of people who have access to the world wide web, the internet has become the main environment where the right to freedom of expression is exercised. In this sense, the information market, vital for democracy, began to have increasingly lower entry barriers for new players. The impact of those changes should not be underestimated or taken lightly. Therefore, this work intends to evaluate the regulation of freedom of expression in virtual environments as a fundamental issue within the contemporary exercise of democratic citizenship.
In this way, it is intended to narrow the theme to address the debate on the mass spreading of misinformation into society through the internet. The ease with which information, whether true or not, is published and spread brings relevant challenges that democracies are finding difficult to absorb. This issue has been at the center of public debate in recent decades and different decisions have been taken to confront the situation. In this sense, it is important to assess their impact on its objective of promoting a better democratic environment. The sources used for this purpose are the relevant decisions taken on the subject on international and domestic Courts, public perception on newspapers and the views of the specialized doctrine.
Rule of Law, Democracy, Fake News
To cite this article:
Hugo Rossi Figueirôa, (2021), What is the impact that policies against “fake news” have on democracy and rule
of law?, Europuls Policy Journal, 1:1, p. 90-102
Adams, J. (2000). The revolutionary writings of John Adams. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
ARGUIÇÃO DE DESCUMPRIMENTO DE PRECEITO FUNDAMENTAL 572/DF, Supremo Tribunal
Federal (Supremo Tribunal Federal do Brasil August 24, 2021). Retrieved September 10, 2021, from
Barbosa, S. (2014, November). (thesis). Escola Base e Imprensa O Jornalismo no Banco dos Réus.
Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://pesquisa.espm.br/wp-
Benedek, W., & Kettemann, M. C. (2013). Freedom Of Expression And The Internet. Strasbourg:
Council of Europe publishing.
Bernays, E. (1928). Propaganda (1st ed.). New York: Liveright.
Bittman, L. (1985). The KGB and Soviet disinformation: an insider’s view. Virginia: Pergamon-
Bonavides, Paulo (2000). Ciência política (10th ed.). São Paulo: Malheiros.
Brazil, LEI No 13.105, DE 16 DE MARÇO DE 2015 (2016). Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Bucombe, A. (2016, November 14). Trump supporters get their news from a political universe that is
often fact-free. The Independent. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
Bulman, M. (2016, November 18). Obama’s team have a terrifying message about why Hillary
Clinton lost. The Independent. Retrieved September 9, 2021
CBS Interactive (2016, December 5). Charges filed against suspected “Pizzagate” gunman. CBS News.
Retrieved September 9, 2021.
Chen, A., Lemann, N., & Cobb, J. (2016, December 1). The propaganda about russian propaganda.
The New Yorker. Retrieved September 9, 2021
Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon books.
Cowan, R. (2016, December 4). Washington police detain gunman who Entered restaurant hit by a
Fake Hillary Clinton scandal. Business Insider. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
De Carvalho, O. (1998). Jardim das Aflições (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Topbooks.
Denúncia. Partido Trabalhista Brasileiro vs. Brazil, Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).
Interamerican Court of Human Rights August 18, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Derosa, C. (2016). A transformação social. São Paulo: Estudos Nacionais.
Diaz, J. (2021, January 14). Jack Dorsey Says Trump’s Twitter ban was ‘Right Decision’ but worries
about precedent. NPR. Retrieved September 10, 2021
Donald J. Trump, Linda Cuadros and American Conservative Union v. Twitter, inc., and Jack
Dorsey, courts listener United States district court for the southern district of Florida Miami
division July 7, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from
Ellul, J. (1980). The Technological System. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.
Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. (n.d.). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible
impact on the outcomes of elections.
Foer, F. (2017). World without mind the existential threat of big tech. Westminister: Penguin Press.
Folha De S. Paulo. (2021, August 13). Prisão de roberto Jefferson ocorre Em inquérito do STF que
driblou a PGR. Folha de S. Paulo. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Foucault, M. (1979). Verdade e poder. In M. Foucault, Microfísica do Poder (14th ed., p. 1–14). São
Gabcikovo-Nagumaros Project (Hung. v. Slovk.), 1997 International Court of Justice 7 (Sept. 25)
Gabinete da Presidência do Supremo Tribunal Federal, Portaria GP No 69 (2019). Retrieved
September 10, 2021, from https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/comunicado-supremo-tribunal-
Gazeta do Povo (2021, September 8). 7 de setembro: como foi A manifestação com Bolsonaro em
São Paulo. Gazeta do Povo. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Greco, R. (2020). O STF e seus inquéritos ilegais. In C. Piovezan (Ed.), O inquérito do fim do mundo
(1st ed., p. 27–42). Londrina: Educação, Direito e Alta Cultura, p. 87-89.
Grillo, L. (2020). O inquérito do fim do mundo, a ruína das liberdades e a luta pelo Direito. In C.
Piovezan (Ed.), O inquérito do fim do mundo (1st ed., pp. 27–42). Londrina: Educação, Direito e
Alta Cultura, p. 49-53.
Hegel, G. (1990). Princípios da Filosofia do Direito. Lisboa: Guimarães.
Human Rights Council, Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 5 July 2018 38/7.
The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet (2018).
Icaro Lima de Carvalho vs Facebook Serviços Online do Brasil Ltda., E-saj SP (Tribunal de Justiça
de São Paulo June 24, 2021). Retrieved September 10, 2021
International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally
Wrongful Acts, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.IV.E.1.
Ivashchenko v Russia, App. no. 61064/10, European Court of Human Rights, Third Section,
Judgment (13 February 2018).
Jones, E. M. (2019). Libido Dominandi. Campinas: Vide.
Junior, T. S. F. (2001). A LIBERDADE COMO AUTONOMIA RECÍPROCA DE ACESSO À
INFORMAÇÃO. In I. G. da S. Martins & M. A. Greco (Eds.), Direito e Internet relações jurídicas na
sociedade informatizada (p. 241–247). São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.
Kacha, Y. (2021, August 12). In a post-COVID-19 WORLD, “fake News” laws, a new blow to
freedom of expression in Algeria And Morocco/Western Sahara? Amnesty International. Retrieved
September 10, 2021
Kelsen, H. (2003). Teoria Pura do Direito. São Paulo: Martin Fontes.
Key, W. B. (1993). The Age of Manipulation. Maryland: Maddison.
Krieg, G., & Berlinger, J. (2016, October 20). Hillary Clinton: Donald Trump would be Putin’s
‘PUPPET’ | CNN POLITICS. CNN. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
Lemos, C. (2021, September 4). STF X Bolsonaro: Apoiadores contabilizam 13 “presos políticos”. R7.
Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Lynskey, D. (2019, May 19). Nothing but the truth: The legacy of George Orwell’s Nineteen
Eighty-Four. The Guardian. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Mak, T. (2016, December 4). ‘Pizzagate’ gunman Liked Alex Jones. The Daily Beast. Retrieved
September 9, 2021.
Marcondes, D. (2007). Iniciação à história da filosofia (2nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Marinho, C. B. (2013). Freedom of Expression on the Internet. Office of the Special Rapporteur for
Freedom of Expression Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
Mendes, E. (2021, August 25). In U.S., trust in media Recovers slightly FROM all-time low.
Gallup.com. Retrieved September 9, 2021
Mills, C. W. (2000). The Power Elites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgenstern, F. (2020). O Ministério da Verdade 2.0. In C. Piovezan (Ed.), O inquérito do fim do
mundo (1st ed., p. 27–42). Londrina: Educação, Direito e Alta Cultura.
Morozov, E. (2018). Big Tech. São Paulo: Ubu editora.
Morrison, W. (2006). Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Martin Fontes.
Mouvement Raelien Suisse v. Switzerland (13 July 2012). European Court of Human Rights.
Application No. 16354/06.
Mueller, R. S., Helderman, R. S., Zapotosky, M., & United States. (2019). The Mueller report.
National Archives and Records Administration. (n.d.). Founders online: Apology for printers, 10
June 1731. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved October 5, 2021, from
Patteson, C. (2021, August 30). Top Trump lawyer predicts big Tech case will go to the Supreme
Court. New York Post. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Philipp, J. (2018, March 26). A distopia do “crédito social” do regime chinês. Epoch Times.
Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Piva, A. (2021, August 16). Oswaldo eustáquio denuncia STF por abuso de autoridade. Revista
Oeste. Retrieved September 10, 2021
Renaud v. France (25 February 2010). European Court of Human Rights. Application No. 13290/07.
Santos, B. (2008). Um discurso sobre as ciências. São Paulo: Cortez.
Smith, W. (2019). Cosmos e transcendência. Campinas: Vide.
Streck, L. L. (2021, August 13). Por que O Supremo Acerta AO PRENDER Roberto Jefferson.
Consultor Jurídico. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
Taylor-Sabori v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 47114/99, European Court of Human Rights,
Judgment (22 October 2002).
The List (2016). The List. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from http://www.propornot.com/p/the-
Thiessen, M. (2019, March 26). Opinion | were you relieved or disappointed with the MUELLER
findings? Be honest. The Washington Post. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
Timberg, C. (2016, November 24). Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during
election, experts say. The Washington Post. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General comment no. 34, Article 19, Freedoms of opinion
and expression, 12 September 2011, CCPR/C/GC/34, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed34b562.html [accessed 10 September 2021]
United Nations General Assembly (n.d.). International covenant on civil and political rights.
OHCHR. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from
United Nations Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights (2018, July 17). The promotion,
protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet. Human rights documents. Retrieved
September 10, 2021, from https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?
United Nations. (2020, March 31). UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime IN
COVID-19 Crisis. United Nations. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
United Nations. (n.d.). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. Retrieved
September 10, 2021.
United Nations. General Assembly. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and
protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. A/66/290. August 10, 2011.
Vories, Z. (2021). Google Leaks. New York: Skyhorse.
Wichowsky, A. (2020). The information trade. San Francisco: HarperOne.